IPC PDF IN HINDI

adminComment(0)

भारतीय दंड संहिता से संबंधित नवीनतम निर्णय हेतु कृपया यहां क्लिक करें Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, Indian Penal code ( IPC). GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF LAW. Page 2. Page 3. Page 4. Page 5. Page 6. Page 7. Page 8. Page 9. Page Page Page Page IPC in Hindi Application describe information about constitution of india in Hindi Language. The IPC (Indian Penal Code) is the main criminal code of India.


Ipc Pdf In Hindi

Author:ELISE GAULIN
Language:English, Japanese, Arabic
Country:Costa Rica
Genre:Business & Career
Pages:755
Published (Last):21.05.2016
ISBN:784-1-71372-421-8
ePub File Size:17.46 MB
PDF File Size:14.72 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Sign up for free]
Downloads:25431
Uploaded by: KIRA

Using IPC Gujarati Application read all information of Indian Penal Code( ભારતીય દંડ સંહિતા) in gujarati format and increase knowledge. Its free to use. Indian Penal Code (Hindi) - भारतीय दण्ड संहिता, - Bhartiya Dand Sanhita, Download PDF for Indian Penal Code (Hindi) Table of Contents. Language: Hindi Jurisdiction: Indian. Overview: Download PDF for Indian Penal Code (Hindi) Table of Contents . for IPC " It is a good book for IPC subject.

IAS Compitition 15 December at We all want few things for free, being Advocates, what we can give you here is Free Legal Advice. With the arrival of internet, many servic BCI has decided to pay Rs.

IPC In Hindi (IPC इन हिन्दी)

Yes, BCI has decided to pay Rs. In order to provide relief to the new advocates who struggle at their in Legal profession is not a commercial activity - Running of office by an Advocate in a building cannot be termed as Commercial activity - Electricity rates fixed for Commercial user cannot be charged.

Sema, JJ. Civil Appeal No. SC [Read Judgment]. Pant and A. Khanwilkar, JJ. Police Officers be punished on Acquittal of Accused: Supreme Court. Prasad, Ja Appellant vs The In the state of Jammu and Advocate is an Officer of Justice and he is not Subordinate to the Judge. Kumar and Mrs. Rathnakala, JJ.

Illustrations a Z is thrown from his horse, and is insensible. A, a surgeon, finds that Z requires to be trepanned. A, not intending Z's death, but in good faith, for Z's benefit, performs the trepan before Z recovers his power of judging for himself. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be likely that the shot may kill Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in good faith intending Z's benefit.

A's ball gives A a mortal wound. A has committed on offence. There is not time to apply to the child's guardian.

A performs the operation in spite of the entreaties of the child, intending, in good faith, the child's benefit. People below hold out a blanket. A drops the child from the housetop, knowing it to be likely that the fall may kill the child, but not intending to kill the child, and intending, in good faith, the child's benefit.

Here even if the child is killed by the fall, A has committed no offence. Communication made in good faith: No communication made in good faith is an offence by reason of any harm to the person to whom it is made, if it is made for the benefit of that person. Illustration A, a surgeon, in good faith, communicates to a patient his opinion that he cannot live.

The patient dies in consequence of the shock. A has committed no offence, though he knew it to be likely that the communication might cause the patient's death. Act to which a person is compelled by threats: Except murder, and offences against the State punishable with death, nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is compelled to do it by threats, which, at the time of doing it, reasonably cause the apprehension that instant death to that person will otherwise be the consequence : Provided the person doing the act did not of his own accord, or from a reasonable apprehension of harm to himself short of instant death, place himself in the situation by which he became subject to such constraint.

Explanation 1. Explanation 2. Act causing slight harm: Nothing is an offence by reason that it causes, or that it is intended to cause, or that it is known to be likely to cause, any harm, if that harm is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of such harm. Of the Right of Privates Defence Things done in private defence: Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defence.

Right of private defence of the body and of property: Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in Section 99, to defend - First.

Indian Penal Code

Right of private defence against the act of a person of unsound mind, etc: When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of the person doing that act, or by reason of any misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defence against that act which he would have if the act were that offence.

Illustrations a Z, under the influence of madness, attempts to kill A; Z is guilty of no offence. But A has the same right of private defence which he would have if Z were sane. Z, in good faith, taking A for a house-breaker, attacks A. Here Z, by attacking A under this misconception, commits no offence. But A has the same right of private defence against Z, which he would have if Z were not acting under that misconception.

Acts against which there is no right of private defence: There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt, if done, or attempted to be done, by a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that act may not be strictly justifiable by law.

Section 3. Punishment of offences committed beyond, but which by law may be tried within, India

There is no right of private defence against an act which does not reasonably cause the apprehension of death or of grievous hurt,if done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant acting in good faith under colour of his office, though that direction may not be strictly justifiable by law. There is no right of private defence in cases in which there is time to have recourse to the protection of the public authorities.

Extent to which the right may be exercised. When the right of private defence of the body extends to causing death: The right of private defence of the body extends, under the restrictions mentioned in the last preceding section, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the assailant, if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right be of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely :- First.

When such right extends to causing any harm other than death: If the offence be not of any of the descriptions enumerated in the last preceding section, the right of private defence of the body does not extend to the voluntary causing of death to the assailant, but does extend, under the restrictions mentioned in Section 99, to the voluntary causing to the assailant of any harm other than death.

Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of the body: The right of private defence of the body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises from an attempt or threat to commit the offence though the offence may not have been committed; and it continues as long as such apprehension of danger to the body continues.

When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death: The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in Section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely :- First.

Act No. When such right extends to causing any harm other than death: If the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right of private defence, be theft, mischief, or criminal trespass, not of any of the descriptions enumerated in the last preceding section, that right does not extend to the voluntary causing of death, but does extend, subject to the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing to the wrong-doer of any harm other than death.

Commencement and continuance of the right of private defence of property: The right of private defence of property commences when a reasonable apprehension of danger to the property commences. The right of private defence of property against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the property has been recovered.

The right of private defence of property against robbery continues as long as the offender causes or attempts to cause to any person death or hurt or wrongful restraint or as long as fear of instant death or of instant hurt or of instant personal restraint continues.

The right of private defence of property against criminal trespass or mischief continues as long as the offender continues in the commission of criminal trespass or mischief.

The right of private defence of property against house-breaking by night continues as long as the house-treaspass which has been begun by such house- breaking continues. Right of private defence against a deadly assault when there is risk of harm to innocent person: If in the exercise of the right of private defence against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence extends to the running of that risk.

Illustration A is attacked by a mob who attempt to murder him. He cannot effectually exercise his right of private defence without firing on the mob, and he cannot fire without risk of harming young children who are mingled with the mob.

A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children. Abetment of a thing: A person abets the doing of a thing, who - First. Illustration A, a public officer, is authorized by a warrant from a Court of Justice to apprehend Z. B, knowing that fact and also that C is not Z, wilfully represents to A that C is Z, and thereby intentionally causes A to apprehend C. Here B abets by instigation the apprehension of C. Abettor: A person abets an offence, who abets either the commission of an offence, or the commission of an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence with the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.

Illustrations a A instigates B to murder C. B refuses to do so. A is guilty of abetting B to commit murder.

B in pursuance of the instigation stabs D. A is guilty of instigating B to commit murder. Explanation 3. Illustrations a A, with a guilty intention, abets a child or a lunatic to commit an act which would be an offence, if committed by a person capable by law of committing an offence, and having the same intention as A.

Here A, whether the act be committed or not, is guilty of abetting an offence. B, in consequence of the abetment, does the act in the absence of A and thereby causes Z's death.

Section 2. Punishment of offences committed within India

Here, though B was not capable by law of committing an offence. A is liable to be punished in the same manner as if B had been capable by law of committing an offence, and had committed murder, and he is therefore subject to the punishment of death. B, in consequence of the unsoundness of his mind, being incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is wrong or contrary to law, sets fire to the house in consequence of A's instigation.

B has committed no offence, but a is guilty of abetting the offence of setting fire to a dwelling-house, and is liable to the punishment provided for that offence. A induces B to believe that the property belong to A. B takes the property out of Z's possession, in good faith, believing it to be A's property.

B, acting under this misconception, does not take dishonestly, and therefore does not commit theft. But A is guilty of abetting theft, and is liable to the same punishment as if B had committed theft. Explanation 4. Illustration A instigates B to instigate C to murder Z.

B accordingly instigates C to murder Z, and C commits that offence in consequence of B's instigation. B is liable to be punished for his offence with the punishment for murder; and, as A instigated B to commit the offence, A is also liable to the same punishment.

Explanation 5. It is sufficient if he engages in the conspiracy in pursuance of which the offence is committed. Illustration A concerts with B a plan for poisoning Z. It is agreed that A shall administer the poison. B then explains the plan to C mentioning that a third person is to administer the poison, but without mentioning A's name.

C agrees to procure the poison, and procures and delivers it to B for the purpose of its being used in the manner explained. A administers the poison, Z dies in consequence.

Here, though A and C have not conspired together, yet C has been engaged in the conspiracy in pursuance of which Z has been murdered. C has therefore committed the offence defined in this section and is liable to the punishment for murder.

A is guilty of abetting murder.

All Sections List

Punishment of abetment if the act abetted is committed in consequence, and where no express provision is made for its punishment: Whoever abets any offence shall, if the act abetted is committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence.

Illustrations a A offers a bribe to B, a public servant, as a reward for showing A some favour in the exercise of B's official functions. B accepts the bribe.

A has abetted the offence defined in Section B, in consequence of the instigation, commits that offence. A is guilty of abetting that offence, and is liable to the same punishment as B.

A, in pursuance of the conspiracy, procures the poison and delivers it to B in order that he may administer it to Z. B, in pursuance of the conspiracy, administers the poison to Z in A's absence and thereby causes Z's death. Here B is guilty of murder. A is guilty of abetting that offence by conspiracy, and is liable to the punishment for murder.

And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court or the said Court on the said charge. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with a different intention from that of abettor: Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other.

Liability of abettor when one act abetted and different act done: When an act is abetted and a different act is done, the abettor is liable for the act done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if he had directly abetted it : Provided the act done was a probable consequence of the abetment, and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid or in pursuance of the conspiracy which constituted the abetment. Illustrations a A instigates a child to put poison into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose.BCI has decided to pay Rs.

Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will: Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law : provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will.

Sense of expression once explained Every expression, which is explained in any part of this Code, is used in every part of this Code in conformity with the explanation. Commutation of sentence of imprisonment for life: In every case in which sentence of [imprisonment] for life shall have been passed, [the appropriate Government] may, without the consent of the offender, commute the punishment for imprisonment of either description for a term not exceeding fourteen years.

Eastern Book Company Language: